http://www.examiner.com/x-2782-DC-Gun-R ... iner-email
Recent rumblings from legislative circles in Nashville suggest that gun rights backers Representative Curry Todd (R-Collierville) and Senator Doug Jackson (D-Dickson) are planning to legislatively override a judge’s opinion holding that the definition of “restaurants” in the exception to Tennessee’s general ban on gun carry is “unconstitutionally vague." Reportedly, the legislators plan to more clearly restrict alcohol sales under state law.
But some question the common assumption that Chancellor Claudia Bonnyman's “void for vagueness” ruling makes it illegal to carry guns in Tennessee restaurants today. John Pierce, co-founder of OpenCarry.org and a second year law student who owns a farm just inside Virginia near Bristol, TN is concerned. Pierce worries that the void for vagueness doctrine is being misunderstood "as a sword against criminal defendants instead of the shield from prosecution it traditionally provides."
The November 2009 Davidson County Chancery Court opinion was widely reported as repealing the 2009 bill allowing licensed handgun carriers to carry their guns in alcohol serving restaurants in Tennessee. Chancellor Bonnyman’s opinion states on pages 1-2 that
“TCA § 39-17-1305(c)(3) is unconstitutional because the [restaurant definitional] language in TCA § 39-17-1305(c)(3)(B) ‘and the serving of such meals shall be the principle business conducted' is void for vagueness.”
The Tennessee Department of Public Safety (DPS) has posted the following notice on its website:
“On November 20, 2009, the Davidson County Chancery Court held that the law allowing Tennessee handgun carry permit holders to carry their handguns into establishments serving alcohol was unconstitutional. As a result, the prior law which prohibited all persons from carrying firearms into establishments serving alcohol is back in effect.”
DPS Spokesman Mike Browning told the Examiner.com that
“[a]s I understand it section (c)(3)(b), which was ruled unconstitutional, was an exception to the ban that is still in effect, not allowing a person to carry a firearm where alcohol is served.”
But Professor Dwight Aarons of the University of Tennessee College of law says the issue is more complicated.
Aarons contends that while there is a general legal doctrine that says when a statute is struck down as unconstitutional “the previously law applies,” there is a more specific effect to a “void for vagueness” ruling – that is, that it actually makes it “dangerous” or “foolish” for a prosecutor to prosecute a person who violates the vague statute, i.e., carrying a gun in a restaurant whose “principle business” is not serving meals. The rationale for this doctrine is “to protect the law abiding public” from prosecution under criminal statutes "where the legislature has not spoken with sufficient clarity” says Aarons.
Professor Aarons is excited about incorporating this "gun ‘n bars void for vagueness case” into his course entitled “Legislation.” The ultimate question his course explores is “What is the Law?”
So “what is the law” now on gun carry in alcohol serving restaurants in Tennessee? Tennessee Attorney General Robert E. Cooper Jr.’s Office declined the Examiner.com’s repeated requests to say whether the Chancery Court’s ruling makes it (1) illegal to carry guns in alcohol serving restaurants, or rather, (2) just more difficult to prosecute a person who carries in a restaurant that does not serve enough meals in a given week to qualify for the exception in TCA § 39-17-1305(c)(30(B).
But civil rights attorney John Monroe, a Director of Georgia Carry Inc. and licensed to practice law in Tennessee for many years, does not blame General Cooper for remaining silent on the issue. “I would not expect the AG to give an opinion without being asked for one by a state agency,” explained Monroe