by SomeGuy » Mon May 11, 2009 9:45 pm
I love how they have a great article, then tarnish the whole thing with a line that is unsupported, and out of context. Even if true, I would like to know how many of those 1200 are involving firearms. At least they were honest enough to include other reasons, such as orders of protection (which I would wager a vengeful wife had instituted anyway.)
J. E. F. II, MSN, RN.