by redbarron06 » Mon May 18, 2009 7:50 am
The more I think of this the more it seems to me like the title of this thread is very misleading. The soldier was convicted for a gun malfunction (this is bad enough). The title of this thread makes it sould like he was arrested and convicted just for owning one.
Please change the threads title to reflect it more accuritly. We should not be misleading and trying to spread the same mis-information that the Brady folks are.
Member
Army Aviation Association of America
National Rifle Association
Gun Owners of America
Tennessee Firearms Association