SB 3012 signage Amendment
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 10:34 pm
If in fact, the current version of SB 3012 passes without the amendments being stripped in conference committee, I wonder if the signage portion allowing the "International" circle and slash stand alone signage to become standard for disallowing guns for all businesses would extend to normal property owners.
Would then a circle and slash through a stick man suffice for posting of farm land against trespass? Would sure save me a lot of money on purchasing "legal" signs, and the 4" or so size used by most business would allow 4 printed signs out of a single 8 1/2" X 11" piece of standard paper.
Seems like what is good for the goose should be good for the gander. Reckon Sen, Jackson would put forth a proposal to do away with the TWRA requirement for it's current proscribed signage?
Should Rayburn be allowed to attend to a lessor standard of expense for signage to legally protect his property than farmers and hunting land owners?
Would then a circle and slash through a stick man suffice for posting of farm land against trespass? Would sure save me a lot of money on purchasing "legal" signs, and the 4" or so size used by most business would allow 4 printed signs out of a single 8 1/2" X 11" piece of standard paper.
Seems like what is good for the goose should be good for the gander. Reckon Sen, Jackson would put forth a proposal to do away with the TWRA requirement for it's current proscribed signage?
Should Rayburn be allowed to attend to a lessor standard of expense for signage to legally protect his property than farmers and hunting land owners?