HALF THE BATTLE
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:17 am
It is said in war that doing your job at 100+% means you have a 50% success rate, if you
do not know or understand your opponent, you will fail at least half of the time.
Those odds are about as good as playing Russian Roulette with three of six in the cylinder, and
pulling the trigger, Knowledge is power. Knowledge is awareness. It fills in gaps. Plug your holes
and you might prevent a rout or an end around your flank.
With the upcoming battle on the new statutes already underway, I share with you a link
so that you in turn might better understand at least one of the people at the forefront of
the push to overturn the expanded carry statutes.
Notice the claims that are made, the speech patterns, the lack of knowledge about current firearms
construction, the claims about lost conventions already (need a fact check on that one), the emphasis
on the money side of the bar business and the implication of lost business from non-drinkers,
the contradictions "It's not a constitutional issue... Well, yes and no. Every Amendment has it's
limitations." ( It either is, or is not.) There is a definite reason (even subliminal reason) for
sitting second chair on a fail injunction.
Read it, analyze it and you may better understand how the opposition thinks, believes, and patterns
its behavior.
do not know or understand your opponent, you will fail at least half of the time.
Those odds are about as good as playing Russian Roulette with three of six in the cylinder, and
pulling the trigger, Knowledge is power. Knowledge is awareness. It fills in gaps. Plug your holes
and you might prevent a rout or an end around your flank.
With the upcoming battle on the new statutes already underway, I share with you a link
so that you in turn might better understand at least one of the people at the forefront of
the push to overturn the expanded carry statutes.
Notice the claims that are made, the speech patterns, the lack of knowledge about current firearms
construction, the claims about lost conventions already (need a fact check on that one), the emphasis
on the money side of the bar business and the implication of lost business from non-drinkers,
the contradictions "It's not a constitutional issue... Well, yes and no. Every Amendment has it's
limitations." ( It either is, or is not.) There is a definite reason (even subliminal reason) for
sitting second chair on a fail injunction.
Read it, analyze it and you may better understand how the opposition thinks, believes, and patterns
its behavior.